Arbitration & Dispute Data

Dispute resolution is crippled by the 'He-Said, She-Said' dynamic. Crucial evidence of schedule slippage or scope changes is buried in fragmented, unstructured operative chat that is nearly impossible to collate post-factum.

The structural evidence failure in construction litigation — the data existed, but it was never extracted before the contractor had the opportunity to manage the narrative.

The Status Quo

Reconstructed
After the Fact.
Contested at
Every Turn.

Construction disputes are won or lost on contemporaneous evidence. Both parties had access to the same site communications — the operational messages in which the dispute was born. The side that extracted and structured them first controls the narrative. SiteFlow operates before the dispute crystallises — not after the claim is filed.

Independent extraction. Contractor-proof. Delivered before your opponent orders disclosure.

6–18

Month timeframe from practical completion to resolution of a contested TCC claim — a window during which contractor-managed evidence continues to be prepared and refined, while contemporaneous site data degrades or disappears.

87%

Of documented site events are first recorded in unstructured communications — the primary evidential source that conventional disclosure consistently fails to capture in contemporaneous form before the contractor's narrative is established.

0 visits

Site visits required by SiteFlow's extraction methodology. Data sourced independently with no warning given to the contractor — the audit trail reflects operational reality, not a prepared version of it.

The SiteFlow Advantage

We Extract.
You Litigate.

SiteFlow's extraction layer operates before disclosure. Before the claim. Before the contractor has any opportunity to prepare a narrative. The output is a timestamped, structured evidence ledger your legal team can deploy immediately.

Existing Site
Communications

Unstructured operational communications already in existence across the project lifecycle — daily briefings, group messaging, site activity logs. No new process. No contractor involvement in the extraction scope. No warning given.

Forensic
Classification

Every message classified against legally-relevant event types: delay events, instructions issued, acknowledgements given, SLA breaches, safety violations, and near-misses — each timestamped at source and attributable to specific parties.

Court-Ready
Evidence Ledger

Classified events become an exportable evidence ledger — searchable by event type, date range, or party. Ready for CPR Part 31 disclosure, adjudication bundles, and expert witness reports.

Core Capabilities

Precision Evidence
Across Every
Dispute Type.

Three extraction outputs targeting the three most common failure points in construction dispute evidence. Deploy at instruction or as a standing retainer across your construction portfolio.

Forensic Timeline
Reconstruction

Instantly generate auditable chronologies for Extension of Time (EoT) and SLA disputes. Every instruction, acknowledgement, material delay, and access restriction extracted and timestamped from site communications — structured into a programme impact ledger before opposing counsel orders disclosure.

Outcome — Contemporaneous delay evidence. Programme impact mapped without reliance on contractor records.

Independent Third-Party
Verification

Data extracted by SiteFlow acts as a neutral, indisputable ledger in arbitration. Because extraction is performed independently — without contractor involvement — it cannot be challenged as self-serving or selectively compiled by either party to the dispute.

Outcome — Independent evidence base. Structurally separated from either party's own disclosure.

Legally Defensible
Architecture

Full compliance with the UK Data Protection Act. 100% UK-sovereign data processing. SiteFlow's extraction methodology is architecturally aligned with CPR obligations, adjudication timetables, and Building Safety Act disclosure requirements — admissible across TCC, adjudication, and arbitration proceedings.

Outcome — GDPR-compliant. UK-sovereign. Ready for TCC, adjudication, and arbitration.

Arbitration Intelligence

Go Deeper:
Arbitration Insights

EoT Strategy

The EoT Defence
Playbook

Winning extensions with unstructured data. This playbook maps the specific communication patterns that constitute contemporaneous evidence of contractor-caused delay — and the extraction methodology that transforms them into an immediately usable EoT defence bundle ahead of adjudication or TCC proceedings.

Download the Playbook

Legal Briefing

Forensic Data Audits
in UK Construction Law

A briefing on leveraging NLP in disputes. Examines how natural language processing applied to site communications is being positioned in UK construction law — covering CPR admissibility, expert witness framing, and the emerging precedents in TCC proceedings.

Read the Briefing

Ready to extract before the claim is filed?

ReconstructedAfter the Fact.Contested atEvery Turn.

We Extract.You Litigate.

Existing SiteCommunications

ForensicClassification

Court-ReadyEvidence Ledger

Precision EvidenceAcross EveryDispute Type.

Forensic TimelineReconstruction

Independent Third-PartyVerification

Legally DefensibleArchitecture

Go Deeper:Arbitration Insights

The EoT DefencePlaybook

Forensic Data Auditsin UK Construction Law